MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142441087 · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2013.73

Inference of Gene Regulatory Networks with Variable Time Delay from Time-Series Microarray Data

2013· article· en· W2142441087 on OpenAlexaff
Ola ElBakry, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInferenceLasso (programming language)Gene regulatory networkComputer sciencePairwise comparisonVariable (mathematics)Data miningTime seriesProcess (computing)Biological dataSeries (stratigraphy)Microarray analysis techniquesArtificial intelligenceMachine learningGeneBioinformaticsMathematicsBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regulatory interactions among genes and gene products are dynamic processes and hence modeling these processes is of great interest. Since genes work in a cascade of networks, reconstruction of gene regulatory network (GRN) is a crucial process for a thorough understanding of the underlying biological interactions. We present here an approach based on pairwise correlations and lasso to infer the GRN, taking into account the variable time delays between various genes. The proposed method is applied to both synthetic and real data sets, and the results on synthetic data show that the proposed approach outperforms the current methods. Further, the results using real data are more consistent with the existing knowledge concerning the possible gene interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and BioinformaticsSame topicGene Regulatory Network AnalysisFrench-language works237,207