MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142445824 · doi:10.1364/ao.50.00e112

Wavelength modulation spectroscopy with a pulsed quantum cascade laser for the sensitive detection of acrylonitrile

2011· article· en· W2142445824 on OpenAlexaff
J. Manne, Wolfgang Jäger, J. Tulip

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Optics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsMaterials scienceDemodulationQuantum cascade laserLaserModulation (music)Amplitude modulationWavelengthSpectroscopyFrequency modulationAbsorbancePulse-amplitude modulationOptoelectronicsPhysicsPulse (music)TelecommunicationsRadio frequencyDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A pulsed, distributed feedback (DFB) quantum cascade laser centered at 957 cm−1 was used in combination with a wavelength modulation spectroscopic technique for the detection of acrylonitrile. The laser was excited with short current pulses (5–10 ns), and the pulse amplitude was modulated with a linear subthreshold current ramp at 20 Hz resulting in a ∼2.5 cm−1 frequency scan. This allowed the measurement of spectroscopic features of acrylonitrile with absorption line widths of ∼1 cm−1. A demodulation approach followed by numerical filtering was utilized to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. We then superimposed a 10 kHz sine wave current modulation on top of the 20 Hz current ramp. The resulting high frequency temperature modulation of the DFB structure results in wavelength modulation. A minimum detectable absorbance of ∼10−5, corresponding to the sub 109 levels of acrylonitrile, was achieved with less than a minute averaging time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied OpticsSame topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207