MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142446369 · doi:10.1109/20.952596

Iterative solvers for hierarchal vector finite element analysis of microwave problems

2001· article· en· W2142446369 on OpenAlexaff
Zhi J. Huang, J.P. Webb

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreconditionerConjugate gradient methodFinite element methodIterative methodMatrix (chemical analysis)Dimension (graph theory)Sparse matrixApplied mathematicsMicrowaveComputer scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionAlgorithmMathematical analysisMathematical optimizationMathematicsMaterials sciencePhysicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The finite element analysis of microwave devices reduces to the solution of a large, sparse matrix equation. Several iterative solution methods were tested on the matrices arising when high-order, hierarchical edge elements are used. The best algorithm tested was the conjugate gradient method, with a preconditioner based on symmetric successive overrelaxation. The number of iterations needed was found to increase only slowly with element order for the first three orders, despite the corresponding large increase in the matrix dimension. In all cases there was a rapid deterioration in performance when the element size exceeded about a tenth of a wavelength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207