Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The full conformational space was explored for an achiral and two chiral beta-peptide models: namely For-beta-Ala-NH2, For-beta-Abu-NH2, and For-beta-Aib-NH2. Stability and conformational properties of all three model systems were computed at different levels of theory: RHF/3-21G, B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p)//RHF/3-21G, B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p), MP2//B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p), CCSD//B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p), and CCSD(T)//B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p). In addition, ab initio E = E(phi, micro, psi) potential energy hypersurfaces of all three models were determined, and their topologies were analyzed to determine the inherent flexibility properties of these beta-peptide models. Fewer points were found and assigned than expected on the basis of Multidimensional Conformational Analysis (MDCA). Furthermore, it has been demonstrated, that the four-dimensional surface, E = E(phi, mu, psi), can be reduced into a three-dimensional one: E = E[phi, f(phi), psi]. This reduction of dimensionality of freedom of motion suggests that beta-peptides are less flexible than one would have thought. This agrees with experimental data published on the conformational properties of peptides composed of beta-amino acid residues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it