Cardiovascular effects of 1,8-cineole, a terpenoid oxide present in many plant essential oils, in normotensive rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cardiovascular effects of i.v. treatment with 1,8-cineole, a monoterpenic oxide present in many plant essential oils, were investigated in normotensive rats. This study examined (i) whether the autonomic nervous system is involved in the mediation of 1,8-cineole-induced changes in mean aortic pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) and (ii) whether the hypotensive effects of 1,8-cineole could result from its vasodilatory effects directly upon vascular smooth muscle. In both pentobarbital-anesthetized and conscious, freely moving rats, bolus injections of 1,8-cineole (0.3-10 mg/kg, i.v.) elicited similar and dose-dependent decreases in MAP. Concomitantly, 1,8-cineole significantly decreased HR only at the highest dose (10 mg/kg). Pretreatment of anesthetized rats with bilateral vagotomy significantly reduced the bradycardic responses to 1,8-cineole (10 mg/kg) without affecting hypotension. In conscious rats, i.v. pretreatment with methylatropine (1 mg/kg), atenolol (1.5 mg/kg), or hexamethonium (30 mg/kg) had no significant effects on the 1,8-cineole-induced hypotension, while bradycardic responses to 1,8-cineole (10 mg/kg) were significantly reduced by methylatropine. In rat isolated thoracic aorta preparations, 1,8-cineole (0.006-2.6 mM) induced a concentration-dependent reduction of the contraction induced by potassium (60 mM). This is the first physiological evidence that i.v. treatment with 1,8-cineole in either anesthetized or conscious rats elicits hypotension; this effect seems related to an active vascular relaxation rather than withdrawal of sympathetic tone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".