MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142490978 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2008.ecp.1040

Optimizing Throughput of UWB Networks with AMC, DRP, and Dly-ACK

2008· article· en· W2142490978 on OpenAlexaff
Ruonan Zhang, Lin Cai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltra-Wideband Communications Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePhysical layerComputer networkThroughputQueueing theoryCross-layer optimizationTransmission (telecommunications)WirelessWireless networkLink adaptationChannel (broadcasting)FadingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In wireless networks, the physical layer adaptive modulation and coding (AMC) scheme has been proposed to improve bandwidth efficiency over the time-varying channel. In this paper, we study the performance of ultra-wideband (UWB) based wireless personal area network where AMC is coupled with the distributed reservation protocol (DRP) and the delayed- acknowledgement (Dly-ACK) schemes at the link layer. Considering the channel variation caused by the people shadowing effect, we first propose an analytical model using an embedded Markov chain to investigate the queuing behavior at sender's buffer. Second, the throughput optimization problem is formulated and the optimal transmission mode and payload length are obtained. Simulation results are given to validate the analysis. By jointly considering channel characteristics, physical layer and link layer transmission schemes, the analytical results of the paper can provide useful guidelines for cross-layer optimization, which is essential to ensure quality of services in UWB networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltra-Wideband Communications TechnologyFrench-language works237,207