Molecular characterization of measles virus circulating in the Indian Ocean Islands during 2005–2006 and in France in 2006
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the availability of safe and immunogenic vaccines, measles still causes significant morbidity and mortality especially in Africa. In this study, two measles outbreaks in the Indian Ocean Islands; Mayotte in 2005-2006 and Seychelles in 2006 were studied. Nasopharyngeal swabs, urine and/or blood samples were collected from patients with clinically diagnosed measles. Measles viruses were isolated in four cases from patients in Mayotte. Measles strains circulating in both outbreaks were determined to be genotype D4 when compared to the WHO reference strains. During this time, measles virus was isolated from patients in France and they were also found to belong to the same genotype. The viruses clustered into two distinct D4 subgroups; The Indian Ocean strains were similar to the Montreal-subgroup, whereas the French strains associated with the Johannesburg-subgroup. The Indian Ocean strains formed a homogeneous group. They shared four specific amino acids in the 3' region of the N gene and two amino acids in the H gene, which differed from other genotype D4 viruses. This suggests that the same measles lineage circulated in Mayotte and Seychelles. Sequence comparison of the French isolates with other measles strains showed that they were more closely related to strains circulating in Germany in 2005, which had their origin in Romania. This study provides the baseline for molecular epidemiology of measles virus in Mayotte and Seychelles. The knowledge of circulating measles virus will help in documenting measles elimination program. This report also highlights the fact that progress of measles elimination is blighted continually by the phenomenon of measles importation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".