Remodeling of atrial dimensions and emptying function in canine models of atrial fibrillation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Atrial tachycardia-induced remodeling (ATR) and ventricular tachypacing-induced heart failure (HF) create experimental substrates for atrial fibrillation (AF), and both have been reported to produce atrial dilation and hypocontractility. The relative importance of changes in atrial size and contractility in the two models is unknown. This study compared changes in atrial dimensions and emptying in ATR versus HF dog models and related them to AF promotion. METHODS: In ATR dogs (n=11), the right atrium (RA) was paced at 400/min for 42 days. In HF dogs (n=10), the right ventricle was paced at 240 bpm for 2 weeks, followed by 3 weeks at 220 bpm. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at baseline and weekly thereafter. At a terminal electrophysiological study, RA effective refractory period (ERP) was recorded and AF induced repeatedly by atrial burst pacing to measure mean AF duration (DAF). RESULTS: Left atrial (LA) systolic area increased by 10.0% in ATR versus 48.2% in HF dogs (P=0.008), with significant time-dependent changes in HF (P=0.0001), but not ATR (P=0.16). LA diastolic area increased over time in both groups (P=0.004, 0.0001 for ATR and HF respectively), but increases were much larger in CHF (80.2%) compared to ATR (24.2%, P=0.0002). Similar findings were obtained for RA. Fractional area shortening (FAS) decreased by 19.4% (ATR) versus 41.8% (HF, P=0.007) in LA and 13.7% (ATR) versus 33.7% (HF, P=0.03) in RA. RA ERP correlated with DAF in ATR dogs (r=-0.79, P<0.001), but not in HF dogs (r=0.20, P=NS). DAF and diastolic areas of RA and LA were highly correlated (r=0.71, 0.77; P<0.01 for each) in HF dogs, but not in ATR dogs (r=-0.18, 0.29; P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Remodeling of atrial size and emptying function is much greater in HF than in ATR. Whereas in ATR, electrophysiological remodeling is of prime importance in AF promotion, structural remodeling (as reflected in changes in atrial size and contraction) appears much more important in HF-induced AF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".