MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142618516 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2003.822524

Exact BER Analyses of Nakagami/Nakagami CCI BPSK and Nakagami/Rayleigh CCI QPSK Systems in Slow Fading

2004· article· en· W2142618516 on OpenAlexaff
Kathiravetpillai Sivanesan, Norman C. Beaulieu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNakagami distributionPhase-shift keyingFadingRayleigh fadingBit error rateKeyingFading distributionComputer scienceMathematicsAlgorithmTelecommunicationsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent letter presented an approximate bit error rate (BER) analysis of coherent binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) in cochannel interference with Nakagami faded desired and interfering signals. Here, the exact BER of coherent nonreturn-to-zero (NRZ) BPSK with cochannel interference in Nakagami fading is derived showing that the approximate analysis may be inaccurate. The exact BER of NRZ quaternary PSK (QPSK) with Nakagami faded desired user signal and Rayleigh faded interfering signals is also derived. Slow fading, asynchronous timing and independent fading gains are assumed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207