Validez Facial del Instrumento de Medición de Hábitos de Vida (MHAVIDA) en Personas con Discapacidad de 5-13 Años
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introducción: La Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento (CIF) ha definido la discapacidad como un término que incluye deficiencias, limitaciones en la actividad y restricciones en la participación. Objetivo: Establecer la validez facial del instrumento de medición de hábitos de vida (MHAVIDA), que evalúa la participación social en niños y niñas de entre 5 y 13 años de edad que se encuentran en Condición de Discapacidad (CD). Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio de evaluación de pruebas diagnósticas, así como la adaptación cultural de los instrumentos con 6 madres de niños y niñas sin condición de discapacidad (CD). A su vez, la validez facial fue evaluada por 19 madres de niños y niñas en CD, a quienes se les aplicó el instrumento mediante entrevista, realizada por dos estudiantes de último año de Fisioterapia. Resultados: El instrumento MHAVIDA para el rango de 5 a 13 años de edad, que evalúala participación social fue traducido oficialmente, y adaptado al lenguaje local con preguntas comprensibles, claras y fáciles de responder. Se encontraron palabras o preguntas confusas principalmente en las categorías educación y nutrición del instrumento que fueron modificadas y, finalmente, se obtuvo un instrumento con validez facial y adaptabilidad cultural pertinente al contexto. Conclusión: Se obtuvo un instrumento útil para evaluar la participación social a partir de los hábitos de vida de la población de 5 a 13 años con discapacidad, lo cual proporciona una base sólida para mejorar las intervenciones en rehabilitación.ABSTRACTIntroduction: The International Classification of Functioning (ICF) has defined disability as a term that includes impairments, activity limitations and restrictions. Objective: To establish the facial validity of the instruments Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H) for disabled children between 5 and13 years old. Materials and methods: a study was carried out on the assesment of diagnostic tests, as well as the cultural adaptation of the instruments using 6 mothers of children without disabilities (CD) as a reference. At the same time, the validity was assessed by 19 mothers of boys and girls in CD who were assessed through an interview done by two last year physiotherapy students. Results: The LIFE-H for age 5-13 years old, in order to assess social participation were officially translated, adapted to local language with comprehensible, clear, and easy to answer questions. We obtained an instrument with facial validity and relevant cultural adaptability to the context. We found confusing words or questions in education and nutrition categories in the LIFE-H for 5-13 years old that were modified. Conclusion: We obtained a useful tool to measure social participation from the habits of children with disabilities, which provides a sound basis for improving interventions in rehabilitation. It is suggested to continue the evaluating the reliability of this instrument.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it