MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142649864 · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/86/56005

Kayaking and wagging of liquid crystals under shear: Comparing director and mesogen motions

2009· article· en· W2142649864 on OpenAlex
Yu-Guo Tao, Wouter K. den Otter, W. J. Briels

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEurophysics Letters (EPL) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShear (geology)Shear rateRodShear flowMechanicsBrownian motionFlow (mathematics)PhysicsGeologyThermodynamicsRheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rod-like colloids in dense solutions perform collective orientational motions under shear flow. The periodic tumbling motions of the director, i.e. the average orientation of the rods, are commonly characterized as kayaking, wagging and flow-aligning, in order of increasing shear rate. Our event-driven Brownian dynamics simulations of rigid spherocylinders reproduce these three distinct director motions, but also clearly show, for the first time, that the individual mesogens are kayaking at all shear rates. The synchrony of the mesogens's motions gradually decreases with increasing shear rate, which at a critical shear rate causes a transition of the apparent collective motion from kayaking to wagging. The rods's persistent kayaking also explains the continuity of the tumbling period at this transition and the smooth change from wagging to flow-aligning observed at higher shear rates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it