MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142669007 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2009.4959723

Component-wise pose normalization for pose-invariant face recognition

2009· article· en· W2142669007 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceNormalization (sociology)Computer visionComputer scienceFacial recognition systemInvariant (physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Three-dimensional face recognitionComponent (thermodynamics)Face (sociological concept)PoseFace detectionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The pose variation involved in facial images significantly degrades the performance of face recognition systems. In this paper, a component-wise pose normalization method for facilitating pose-invariant face recognition is proposed. The main idea is to normalize a non-frontal facial image to a virtual frontal image component by component. In this method, we first partition the whole non-frontal facial image into different facial components and then the virtual frontal view for each component is estimated separately. The final virtual frontal image is generated by integrating the virtual frontal components. The proposed method relies only on 2D images, therefore complex 3D modeling is not needed. The experimental results using the CMU-PIE database demonstrate the advantages of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207