The presence of the<i>tet</i>gene from cloning vectors impairs<i>Salmonella</i>survival in macrophages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cloning, mutagenesis and complementation of virulence factors are key steps to understand the mechanisms of bacterial pathogenesis and cloning vectors are routinely utilized for these processes. We have investigated the effect of the presence of commonly used cloning vectors on the survival of the intracellular bacterial pathogen Salmonella during macrophage infection. We demonstrate that the presence of the pSC101 derived tetracycline resistance gene on plasmids causes a lower survival rate of Salmonella in macrophages. The decrease in survival caused by the presence of the tet gene was not due to a higher susceptibility to gentamicin, a growth defect, or to increased sensitivity to acid. Higher susceptibility to hydrogen peroxide was observed in vitro for strain containing plasmid with the tet gene when the strains were grown at high densities but not when they were grown at low densities. Our findings demonstrate that the use of the tet gene for mutation or complementation can have deleterious effects and should thus be carefully considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".