MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142687459 · doi:10.1109/icac.2005.12

Automatic Diagnosis of Performance Problems in Database Management Systems

2005· article· en· W2142687459 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWorkloadDatabaseTransaction processingDatabase transactionDatabase tuningDatabase testingResource (disambiguation)Resource allocationOnline transaction processingProcess (computing)Resource management (computing)Database administratorDatabase serverOnline analytical processingDatabase designDistributed computingDatabase schemaData warehouseView

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Database performance is directly linked to database management system (DBMS) resource allocation. Complex relationships between resources make problem diagnosis and performance tuning difficult, time-consuming tasks. Database administrators (DBAs) currently tune and re-tune the DBMS as the database grows and workloads change. Increased performance and reduced cost of ownership can be achieved by automating the tuning process, starting with resource allocation problem diagnosis. In this paper we overview an automatic diagnosis framework designed to diagnose resource problems. Our diagnosis model and results demonstrate an ability to correctly identify system bottlenecks for a generic on-line transaction processing workload

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.728
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningFrench-language works237,207