Generator contribution coefficients for pricing transmission services
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in the United States has acknowledged the shortcomings of the traditional contract path method as a mechanism for implementing transmission tariffs and has encouraged the development of alternate tariff schemes. This paper presents an alternate method for determining transmission facility usage by a generator. It outlines and discusses mathematical formulae for decomposing the total real power flow that is estimated to exist in a transmission facility. The decomposition produces numerical results that express a transmission line's total real power flow as the summation of the contributions made by each generator, thereby estimating each supplier's use of the system. The technique generalizes a linear expression that is derived from assumptions similar to those used in DC load flow analysis. Each expression is unique to the dispatch on the system at the time. The technique is applied to the AC power flow solution for a modified IEEE standard 14-bus system to evaluate its accuracy on loop feeds, radial feeds and for counter flows. Each generator's contribution to the line flow is totaled and compared to the original AC load flow solution to evaluate accuracy. The results are then applied to certain flow mile topics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it