Mechanism and kinetics of H‐acid degradation in TiO<sub>2</sub>/O<sub>3</sub>/UV process
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The mechanism and kinetics of synergetic effect in TiO 2 /O 3 /UV process on H‐acid degradation were investigated. The experimental results showed that H‐acid removal rate of TiO 2 /O 3 /UV process was the highest among TiO 2 /UV, O 3 /UV and TiO 2 /O 3 /UV processes. The investigation of reactions with suitable active species scavengers confirmed that H‐acid was mainly oxidised by ozone and holes on TiO 2 in the TiO 2 /O 3 /UV process. The recombination between holes and electrons in TiO 2 reduced in the presence of ozone, as indicated by fluorescence emission spectra. Moreover, the intermediates generated during H‐acid oxidation in various processes were analysed by LC/MSD trap. It is proposed that H‐acid was oxidised to polyhydroxy aromatics, benzene carboxylic acids and quinoids in the first step. Then, saturated aliphatics carboxylic acids were formed and mineralised to inorganic compounds through the Photo‐Kolbe reaction. Finally, a kinetic study on TiO 2 /UV, O 3 /UV and TiO 2 /O 3 /UV processes was conducted and it was confirmed that both ozonation and photocatalytic activity were improved in TiO 2 /O 3 /UV process because of the synergetic effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it