MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142716864 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2001.986145

Self synchronization of time delay and integration (TDI) cameras

2002· article· en· W2142716864 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtremum Seeking Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTime delay and integrationPixelField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceCharge-coupled deviceComputer visionSynchronization (alternating current)Image qualityImage sensorRowSIGNAL (programming language)Image (mathematics)Artificial intelligenceRow and column spacesReal-time computingElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareOpticsEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time Delay Integration (TDI) is a technology used in line-scan cameras to improve moving image quality. As an image sweeps over the sensor array, the pixels collect charge; at certain intervals the charge in the wells in each of the rows is moved to their adjacent rows, in the same direction and velocity as the moving image. TDI sensors help provide high quality and contrast image even under low illumination as long as image speed is same with the speed of the charge movement. TDI is modeled as a natural sampler and based on the properties of this mathematical model, low complexity algorithms that can fit into an FPGA are developed to self synchronize the TDI based on the change in the high frequency components of the output signal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicExtremum Seeking Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207