Measuring magnetic fields of early-type stars with $\vec{FORS{\it 1}}$ at the $\vec{VLT}$
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes an experiment aimed at evaluating the capability of the FORS1 instrument at the VLT for measuring weak (0.1%) Zeeman circular polarization signatures in stellar H Balmer lines. We have obtained low-resolution polarized spectra at 3500–5800 Å of two bright A-type stars, HD 94660, and HD 96441. The former is a well known magnetic star, the latter an apparently non-magnetic, unpolarized star that was observed for comparison purposes. In order to test the possibility of performing multi-object spectropolarimetric measurements (e.g., for cluster studies), observations were taken both on-axis (i.e., at the CCD field center) and off-axis (i.e., at the edges of the CCD). In HD 94660 (the magnetic star), we detected a clear signal of circular polarization in all observed hydrogen Balmer lines (i.e., from Hβ to the Balmer limit), with a typical peak-to-peak amplitude of about 0.8%. From the analysis of Stokes V under the weak-field approximation, we have estimated a mean longitudinal field of G, a value fully consistent with previous studies of this star. Notably, we found that at wavelengths shorter than about 4100 Å, the polarization signal detected off-axis is about 20–30% smaller than that detected on-axis. No polarization due to the Zeeman effect was detected in the comparison star HD 96441, and we estimate that the contribution due to instrumental circular polarization is limited to the order of . This experiment demonstrates the effectiveness of FORS1 at the VLT as a tool for high-sensitivity diagnosis of the magnetic field in upper main sequence stars, providing the potential for measuring fields in fainter and more rapidly rotating stars than has previously been possible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".