ANALYSIS OF PREFERENTIAL NETWORK MOTIF GENERATION IN AN ARTIFICIAL REGULATORY NETWORK MODEL CREATED BY DUPLICATION AND DIVERGENCE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies on network topology of artificial gene regulatory networks created by whole genome duplication and divergence processes show subgraph distributions similar to gene regulatory networks found in nature. In particular, certain network motifs are prominent in both types of networks. In this contribution, we analyze how duplication and divergence processes influence network topology and preferential generation of network motifs. We show that in the artificial model such preference originates from a stronger preservation of protein than regulatory sites by duplication and divergence. If these results can be transferred to regulatory networks in nature, we can infer that after duplication the paralogous transcription factor binding site is less likely to be preserved than the corresponding paralogous protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it