MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142726440 · doi:10.5430/jnep.v4n1p50

A cross-sectional baseline survey investigating the relationship between dietary diversity and cardiovascular risk factors in women from the Vaal Region, South Africa

2013· article· en· W2142726440 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wilna Oldewage‐Theron, Abdulkadir Egal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSouth Africa Netherlands research Programme on Alternatives in DevelopmentNational Research Foundation
KeywordsBody mass indexOverweightAnthropometryMedicineObesityBlood pressureObservational studyDemographyCross-sectional studyFood groupLipid profileAnalysis of varianceEnvironmental healthInternal medicineCholesterol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Dyslipidaemia, an abnormality in circulating serum cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density and low-density lipoproteins, is one of the risk factors of cardiovascular disease. The role of nutrients is well known in the development of cardiovascular disease, but little emphasis is placed on total diet quality. Food group diversity and food variety scores are often used to reflect diet quality. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between dietary diversity and cardiovascular disease risk factors among low-income women in the Vaal Region. Methods: A cross-sectional, observational baseline survey was undertaken in 722 randomly selected black women in four purposively selected peri-urban settlements in the Vaal Region. Measurements included socio-demographic data, dietary intake (24-hour recall), dietary diversity (food frequency), anthropometric (weight and height), blood pressure and biochemi- cal indices (lipid profile). Data analyses included descriptive statistics, multivariate analyses of variance, analyses of variance and regression analyses. Results: The mean individual dietary diversity score±standard deviation (SD) for the total group was 6.4±2.4. Those women in the low dietary diversity category were significantly ( p =0.020) younger (45.8±4.4 years) and had a significantly ( p =0.002) higher body mass index (30.7±2.8 kg/m 2 ). The mean±SD of body mass index for the low and medium dietary diversity categories respectively indicated obesity (≥30 kg/m 2 ) compared to overweight in the high dietary diversity category (29.3±5.4 kg/m 2 ). The mean±SD systolic blood pressure (134.9±19.5) was significantly ( p =0.000) higher in the low dietary diversity category, whereas the medium dietary diversity category showed the highest mean±SD total triglyceride level of 70.3±23.7 mg/dl. The high dietary diversity category was associated with the highest total serum cholesterol (176.4±24.2 mg/dl), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (103.8±28.7 mg/dl) and lowest high density lipoprotein cholesterol (46.1±10.6 mg/dl) levels. Conclusions: Higher dietary diversity was associated with a healthier diet, not only in terms of nutrient intakes, but also with regard to food group variety across all nine nutritious food groups. Although relationships between dietary diversity and cardiovascular disease risk factors were observed, discrepant findings have been noted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.232
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and PracticeSame topicNutritional Studies and DietFrench-language works237,207