MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142729838 · doi:10.1109/psce.2006.296348

Determination of an Accurate Dynamic Security Constraint with Applications in Market Dispatch

2006· article· en· W2142729838 on OpenAlexaff
U.D. Annakkage, A. G. Buddhika P. Jayasekara, L.Y.C. Amarasinghe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstraint (computer-aided design)Computer scienceElectric power systemMathematical optimizationElectricity marketStability (learning theory)Transient (computer programming)Linear programmingElectricityPower (physics)AlgorithmEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes the inclusion of transient stability constraints in generation dispatch algorithms used in electricity markets to ensure dynamic security. The proposed security constraint is derived by applying a non-linear surface fitting technique to a database generated off-line. The technique used has two key features that enables the derivation of an accurate transient stability constraint with a relatively short computing time compared to other comparable methods. One feature is that it uses a linear estimation technique to estimate a non-linear function by means of a non-linear transformation. The second important feature is that it employs an implicit technique to gain significant reduction in computing burden. The potential of the proposed method is demonstrated using the New England 39 bus system and a larger power system with 470 buses. The security constraint derived for the New England 39 bus system is used in an optimal power flow (OPF) program for market clearance. The locational marginal prices (LMP) obtained from the OPF are further analyzed to determine the component of LMP due to dynamic security

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207