Presence of autoantibodies against tubular and uveal cells in a patient with tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis (TINU) syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis (TINU) syndrome is characterized by acute tubulointerstitial nephritis with a favourable course and chronic recurrent uveitis. Since the first description in 1975 [ 1 ], more than 150 cases have been described in the literature [ 2 ]. Most of the patients with TINU syndrome are adolescents and young women, with a median age of onset of 15 (range 9 to 74) years. Renal tubulointerstitial infiltrates are primarily composed of activated lymphocytes, among which the helper/inducer T-cell subset is reported to be predominant [ 3,4 ]. In addition, TINU syndrome can be associated with granuloma in kidney or in another localization like bone marrow [ 1 , 5–7 ]. The pathogenesis of TINU syndrome remains unclear, but cell-mediated immunity, in particular delayed-type hypersensitivity, could play a large role in this disorder [ 8 ]. In addition, some studies suggest that uveitis and tubulointerstitial nephritis have a common immunological pathogenesis and so it was postulated that there may be a common antigenicity between renal and ocular tissues [ 3 , 9 ].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".