MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142826677 · doi:10.1002/star.200390036

Synthesis of Novel Starches <i>in Planta</i>: Opportunities and Challenges

2003· article· en· W2142826677 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStarch - Stärke · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood composition and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanPlant Biotechnology Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStarchBiotechnologyBiochemical engineeringBiochemistryChemistryFood scienceBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In addition to being the main source of energy in the human diet, starch is also used for a wide variety of industrial processes. Potato, maize, wheat and cassava are the major sources for industrial starch. While there are significant species‐dependent differences among these starches, in most cases it is necessary to chemically or physically modify the starches in order to meet the various industrial needs. The advent of molecular biology and genetic engineering has provided the requisite technologies to produce starches in planta with improved properties, which may reduce or eliminate the need for in vitro starch modification. In the last decade significant progress in our understanding of starch biosynthesis has been achieved through the use of these technologies. In this review, starch structure, functionality and use in industry are discussed. The recent discoveries in the area of starch biosynthesis are reviewed and several potential plant breeding and/or genetic engineering strategies for the modification of starch synthesis in planta are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.120 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it