MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142868281 · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/5/1947

THE DENSE MOLECULAR RIDGE IN NGC 2024

2008· article· en· W2142868281 on OpenAlexaff
Tomomi Watanabe, George F. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsVirial theoremAstrophysicsRidgeMean kinetic temperatureGravitational collapseMolecular cloudKinetic energyStarsGalaxyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NGC 2024 is a star-forming region in Orion B that contains a dense molecular ridge. A number of dense cores are seen by their dust emission. This area is investigated using observations of four formaldehyde transitions—namely, 303 → 202, 322 → 221, 505 → 404, and 523 → 422. Maps of the ridge are used to provide temperatures and densities, with a focus on the dense-core positions. The formaldehyde transition ratios 303 → 202/322 → 221 and 505 → 404/523 → 422 offer measurements of the kinetic temperature, while the ratio 303 → 202/505 → 404 allows the evaluation of number densities. The resulting temperatures are very warm (45–85 K), with no observed variation between the core centers and their envelopes. H2CO number densities of ∼2 × 106 cm−3 at far-infrared (FIR) core positions and H2CO column densities in the range of 6 × 1014 to 1 × 1015 cm−2 are derived. Using the derived properties in combination with previous submillimeter continuum data, core masses of ∼2 M☉ are found within a 15'' beam size. H2CO fractional abundances are calculated and resemble previous values found in similar star-forming regions—between 2 × 10−9 and 5 × 10−9. The virial theorem applied to FIR cores 3, 4, 5, and 6 suggests that all four cores are unstable against gravitational collapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.262
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207