MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142881112 · doi:10.1094/pd-89-1013c

White Mold of Houndstongue (<i>Cynoglossum officinale</i>) Caused by <i>Sclerotinia sclerotiorum</i> in Canada

2005· article· en· W2142881112 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hsiao‐Wen Huang, R. S. Erickson, B. Van Hezewijk, Rosemarie De Clerck-Floate

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSclerotinia sclerotiorumBiologyMyceliumAscocarpBotanyPotato dextrose agarPetri dishHyphaHorticultureSunflowerAgarMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Houndstongue (Cynoglossum officinale L.) is a rangeland weed introduced into Canada from Eurasia, and it can be highly toxic to livestock feeding in pastures (3). During 2004, houndstongue plants near Creston, BC, Canada developed water-soaked lesions with white mycelia and black sclerotia on leaves and crowns. Isolations from diseased leaf tissues and sclerotia on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 20°C for 5 to 7 days produced fungal colonies with formation of black sclerotia 5 to 10 mm in diameter. A single hyphal tip isolate from houndstongue. Ss-HT-C. was compared with a sunflower isolate of S. sclerotiorum, sun-87 (1), for morphology and pathogenicity. For apothecial production, Ss-HT-C and sun-87 were grown on PDA in petri dishes at 10°C for 10 weeks, and sclerotia produced were harvested, placed on moist vermiculite in petri dishes, and incubated at 20°C under light for 3 weeks. Mature apothecia were excised, stained with acid fuchsin, mounted on slides, and examined for asci and ascospores with a microscope. There were no morphological differences between Ss-HT-C and sun-87, each producing an ascus with eight binucleate, elliptical ascospores, measuring 4 × 10 μm (width × length), supporting the identity of Ss-HT-C as S. sclerotiorum (2,4). For pathogenicity tests of Ss-HT-C and sun-87, mycelial plugs (8 mm in diameter) were removed from the margin of colonies grown on PDA for 5 days at 20°C, and placed on leaves of C. officinale plants that were grown in a greenhouse (20 ± 4°C) to the rosette stage. Inoculated plants were covered with clear plastic bags, kept in the same greenhouse for 3 days, and the diameters of the leaf lesions developed at inoculation sites were measured. The experiment was run twice with 30 plants per isolate and five leaves per plant. Uninoculated plants covered with plastic bags were used as controls. Experiments used a completely randomized design. Results of leaf inoculations showed that Ss-HT-C and sun-87 were pathogenic to hound-stongue. There was no statistical difference between isolates or trials. The frequency of leaves with lesions was 90% for Ss-HT-C and 93% for sun-87. The mean leaf lesion diameters were 32 and 35 mm for Ss-HT-C and sun-87, respectively. Leaves of control plants remained healthy. S. sclerotiorum was reisolated from leaves with lesions, but not from controls. After 14 to 21 days, new sclerotia, 5 to 10 mm in diameter, were formed on leaves of inoculated plants. The plants eventually died. This study confirms that S. sclerotiorum is the causal agent for the disease of hound-stongue in Canada, and to our knowledge, this is the first world record of infection of this weed by S. sclerotiorum. References: (1) H. C. Huang and G. C. Kozub. Plant Prot. Bull. 31:333, 1989. (2) L. Kohn, Phytopathology 69:881, 1979. (3) J. A. Pfister et al. J. Range Manag. 45:254, 1992. (4) J. A. L. Wong and H. J. Willetts, J. Gen. Microbiol. 112:29, 1979.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207