MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142907218 · doi:10.1109/tns.2006.875441

Real time digital signal processing implementation for an APD-based PET scanner with phoswich detectors

2006· article· en· W2142907218 on OpenAlexafffund
Réjean Fontaine, Marc‐André Tétrault, François Bélanger, Nicolas Viscogliosi, R. Himmich, J.-B. Michaud, S. Robert, Jean‐Daniel Leroux, Hicham Semmaoui, P. Bérard, J. Cadorette, C. Pépin, Roger Lecomte

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsNuclear electronicsDead timeAvalanche photodiodeComputer hardwareTimestampSignal processingComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayData acquisitionPreamplifierSilicon photomultiplierGate arrayElectronic engineeringDetectorAnalog signalPhysicsDigital signal processingOpticsEngineeringReal-time computingCMOSAmplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent progress in advanced digital signal processing provides an opportunity to expand the computation power required for real time extraction of event characteristics in avalanche photodiode (APD)-based Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanners. These developments are made possible by a highly parallel data acquisition (DAQ) system based on an integrated analog front-end and a high-speed fully digital signal processing section that directly samples the output of each preamplifier with a free-running, off-the-shelf, 45-MHz analog-to-digital converter that feeds the sampled data into a field programmable gate array (FPGA) VirtexII PRO from Xilinx. This FPGA features /spl sim/ 31 000 logic cells and two PowerPC processors, which allows up to 64 channels to be processed simultaneously. Each channel has its own digital signal processing chain including a trigger, a baseline restorer and a timestamp algorithm. Various timestamp algorithms have been tested so far, achieving a coincidence timing resolution of 3.2-ns full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) for APD coupled to Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (APD-LSO) and 11.4-ns FWHM for APD coupled to Bismuth Germanium Oxide (APD-BGO) detectors, respectively. Channels are then multiplexed into a DSP processor from Texas Instruments for crystal identification by an ARMAX recursive algorithm borrowed from identification and vector quantization theory. The system can sustain an event rate of 10 000 events/s/channel without electronic dead time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207