MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142907218 · doi:10.1109/tns.2006.875441

Real time digital signal processing implementation for an APD-based PET scanner with phoswich detectors

2006· article· en· W2142907218 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCMC Microsystems
KeywordsNuclear electronicsDead timeAvalanche photodiodeComputer hardwareTimestampSignal processingComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayData acquisitionPreamplifierSilicon photomultiplierGate arrayElectronic engineeringDetectorAnalog signalPhysicsDigital signal processingOpticsEngineeringReal-time computingCMOSAmplifier

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent progress in advanced digital signal processing provides an opportunity to expand the computation power required for real time extraction of event characteristics in avalanche photodiode (APD)-based Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanners. These developments are made possible by a highly parallel data acquisition (DAQ) system based on an integrated analog front-end and a high-speed fully digital signal processing section that directly samples the output of each preamplifier with a free-running, off-the-shelf, 45-MHz analog-to-digital converter that feeds the sampled data into a field programmable gate array (FPGA) VirtexII PRO from Xilinx. This FPGA features /spl sim/ 31 000 logic cells and two PowerPC processors, which allows up to 64 channels to be processed simultaneously. Each channel has its own digital signal processing chain including a trigger, a baseline restorer and a timestamp algorithm. Various timestamp algorithms have been tested so far, achieving a coincidence timing resolution of 3.2-ns full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) for APD coupled to Lutetium Oxyorthosilicate (APD-LSO) and 11.4-ns FWHM for APD coupled to Bismuth Germanium Oxide (APD-BGO) detectors, respectively. Channels are then multiplexed into a DSP processor from Texas Instruments for crystal identification by an ARMAX recursive algorithm borrowed from identification and vector quantization theory. The system can sustain an event rate of 10 000 events/s/channel without electronic dead time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it