MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142936647 · doi:10.1109/cdc.1995.480391

The adaptive servomechanism problem for MIMO systems

2002· article· en· W2142936647 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ServomechanismMIMONonlinear systemController (irrigation)Bounded functionTransient (computer programming)PiecewiseComputer scienceMathematicsTransient responseControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)TelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, new theoretical and simulated results for the robust adaptive servomechanism problem considered in Miller and Davison (1987, 1992) for unknown MIMO systems are given. As in Miller and Davison (1989) and Chang and Davison (1995) the proposed controller is nonlinear and of the switching type, and has the properly that after a finite time, switching ceases, thereby resulting in the system being controlled by a LTI controller. The switching mechanism which the authors present is robust to all bounded piecewise continuous references y/sub ref/(t) and disturbances w(t), attempts to provide a "reasonable" transient response by "monitoring" plant output y(t) and/or error signal e(t), and, while limited to strictly proper finite dimensional MIMO systems, is computationally simpler than for the case of continuous reference and disturbance signals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207