MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142949106 · doi:10.1139/v03-012

Electrocatalytic oxidation and flow amperometric detection of hydrazine on a dinuclear ruthenium phthalocyanine-modified electrode

2003· article· en· W2142949106 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mehrdad Ebadi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrochemical sensors and biosensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmperometryChemistryRutheniumHydrazine (antidepressant)ElectrocatalystCyclic voltammetryPhthalocyanineElectrodeInorganic chemistryTafel equationFlow injection analysisElectrochemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Detection limitCatalysisOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electrocatalytic oxidation of hydrazine on a dinuclear ruthenium phthalocyanine ((RuPc)2) modified electrode was studied using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and rotating disc electrode (RDE) techniques. At pH = 13, a four-electron oxidation of hydrazine to N2 was observed. A suitable mechanism was proposed by analyzing the rate equation and the Tafel slope. The flow injection analysis was performed to characterize the (RuPc)2-modified electrode as an amperometric sensor for the detection of hydrazine. The electrode displays an excellent accuracy and precision in phosphate solution at pH 12 and 13. The linearity range was from 30 nM to 1 mM with a correlation coefficient of 0.9998.Key words: ruthenium phthalocyanine, electrocatalysis, surface-modified electrode, hydrazine, amperometric sensor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.165
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicElectrochemical sensors and biosensorsFrench-language works237,207