MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142949625 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564614

Switch loss and antenna directivity effects on MIMO antenna selection

2008· article· en· W2142949625 on OpenAlex
Javad Ahmadi‐Shokouh, S.H. Jamali, Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini, G.Z. Rafi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntenna (radio)Antenna noise temperatureAntenna factorComputer scienceAntenna measurementDirectivity3G MIMOElectronic engineeringAntenna efficiencyAntenna gainAntenna arrayCoaxial antennaMIMOTelecommunicationsAcousticsOmnidirectional antennaEngineeringPhysicsBeamforming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the effect of antenna directivity on multi-input-multi-output (MIMO) antenna selection. A 4 orthogonal pattern antenna array platform at the receiver side associated with an antenna selection mechanism is used in this study. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated for two cases where the antenna selection switches are located either after or before Low Noise Amplifiers (LNA), on a MIMO system under the diversity transmission. The results show how the antenna directivity and switch loss can affect the overall MIMO system performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it