Synergic effects in catalytic systems Mo(VI) − hydroxyl-containing ligand – KClO<sub>3</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of some hydroxyl-containing ligands (L) on the catalytic current in the system molybdenum(VI) – potassium chlorate has been investigated. It has been shown that the phenomenon of synergism in studying catalytic currents is associated with the activating action of L. The activity of a mixture of L and an oxidant significantly exceeds the sum of effects for their separate influence. The growth of catalytic current is possible if the catalyst (a metal ion M) possesses free or labile seats in the coordination area for formation of intermediate active compounds of the catalyst with the oxidant. It has been shown that the increase of the catalytic current is associated with formation of the intermediate active complex [Mo(V) L ClO–3]. The scheme of reactions occurring in solution and on an electrode has been elaborated. Found values of the formation constant, energy, and entropy of intermediate active complexes prove the high activity of such systems, improving the voltammetric determination of the metal catalyst by more than one order.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".