DC-SIGN ligation greatly affects dendritic cell differentiation from monocytes compromising their normal function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
DC-SIGN is a C-type lectin selectively expressed by certain types of DCs, including monocyte-derived DCs. Many reports have described the impact of DC-SIGN engagement with concomitant TLR signaling in tailoring of the DC maturation process, but so far, none has addressed the importance of DC-SIGN engagement during their differentiation from blood progenitors. We therefore examined the role of DC-SIGN engagement limited to the stage of IL-4-guided differentiation of DCs from human peripheral blood monocytes but not during maturation. We used two different anti-DC-SIGN antibodies with reported DC-SIGN-engaging activities. In cultures with DC-SIGN ligands, the resulting iDCs displayed abrogated expression of differentiation markers CD1a and DC-SIGN. Without further DC-SIGN activation, such DCs matured with low CD80/CD86 and high ILT3 expression, along with the appearance of macrophage marker CD14. Additionally, treated DCs indicated a tolerogenic potential by possessing a low, allostimulatory capacity and inducing naïve, allogeneic CD4(+) T cells to produce low levels of IFN-γ. Upon activation, IL-10 production was greatly increased by such DCs; however, the use of IL-10-blocking antibodies could not completely reverse alternative DC activation. This suggests an alternative activation response that is a result of a different elementary state of DCs generated with concomitant ligation of DC-SIGN. During differentiation, IL-4-induced pSTAT6 was reduced by DC-SIGN ligands. Furthermore, during LPS-induced maturation, treated DCs displayed lowered activation levels of p38 MAPK, STAT1, as well as STAT6, compared with controls. Collectively, evidence is presented confirming a crucial role for DC-SIGN signaling in DC generation from monocytes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".