Sex ratio variation in gynodioecious species of<i>Echium</i>endemic to the Canary Islands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Species of Echium from the Canary Islands represent an adaptive radiation of plants involving evolutionary changes in habitat and life form. Alongside these changes, evolutionary transitions of the sexual system have occurred: approximately one quarter of Echium species from the Canary Islands are dimorphic for gender, paralleling other adaptive radiations of plants on oceanic islands, such as Schiedea in Hawaii. Here, I report on the variation in the frequency of female plants among eight gynodioecious populations representing four species of Echium on the island of Tenerife, and provide preliminary estimates of the seed fertility of females and hermaphrodites, which is an important determinant of the sex ratio for gynodioecious species. Across populations, female frequencies ranged between 6% and 54%, a much wider range than had previously been reported for gynodioecious species of Echium on the Canary Islands. Substantial frequencies of female plants occurred, even though no differences in the seed fertility of females and hermaphrodites were detected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".