MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2142982301 · doi:10.7202/045834ar

Le suicide des jeunes : une pathologie du devenir adulte contemporain

2011· article· fr· W2142982301 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Daniel Dagenais

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPoison controlPhilosophyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente l’analyse d’une trentaine de cas de suicide de jeunes à partir d’entrevues avec les proches. L’enquête révèle un contraste marqué entre deux logiques passionnelles repérables dans la vie de ces jeunes et exprimées à travers leur suicide : la peur (adolescente) et le refus (jeune) du devenir adulte, passions qui ont crû dans des contextes familiaux eux aussi nettement contrastés. Appréhendant à partir de là le suicide des jeunes comme pathologie sociale , l’auteur ouvre la porte à l’interprétation de ces types comme types anomiques et fatalistes purs, anthropologiques. L’approche proposée se veut une réfutation du paradigme suicidologique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.272
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociographiquesSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207