Targeted deletion of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 attenuates left ventricular remodeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Left ventricular remodeling that occurs after myocardial infarction (MI) and pressure overload is generally accepted as a determinant of the clinical course of heart failure. The molecular mechanism of this process, however, remains to be elucidated. Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) is a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase that plays an important role in stress-induced apoptosis. We used ASK1 knockout mice (ASK-/-) to test the hypothesis that ASK1 is involved in development of left ventricular remodeling. ASK-/- hearts showed no morphological or histological defects. Echocardiography and cardiac catheterization revealed normal global structure and function. Left ventricular structural and functional remodeling were determined 4 weeks after coronary artery ligation or thoracic transverse aortic constriction (TAC). ASK-/- had significantly smaller increases in left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic ventricular dimensions and smaller decreases in fractional shortening in both experimental models compared with WT mice. The number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase biotin-dUDP nick end-labeling-positive myocytes after MI or TAC was decreased in ASK-/- compared with that in WT mice. Overexpression of a constitutively active mutant of ASK1 induced apoptosis in isolated rat neonatal cardiomyocytes, whereas neonatal ASK-/- cardiomyocytes were resistant to H2O2-induced apoptosis. An in vitro kinase assay showed increased ASK1 activity in heart after MI or TAC in WT mice. Thus, ASK1 plays an important role in regulating left ventricular remodeling by promoting apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".