Digital microfluidic hydrogel microreactors for proteomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proteolytic digestion is an essential step in proteomic sample processing. While this step has traditionally been implemented in homogeneous (solution) format, there is a growing trend to use heterogeneous systems in which the enzyme is immobilized on hydrogels or other solid supports. Here, we introduce the use of immobilized enzymes in hydrogels for proteomic sample processing in digital microfluidic (DMF) systems. In this technique, preformed cylindrical agarose discs bearing immobilized trypsin or pepsin were integrated into DMF devices. A fluorogenic assay was used to optimize the covalent modification procedure for enzymatic digestion efficiency, with maximum efficiency observed at 31 μg trypsin in 2-mm diameter agarose gel discs. Gel discs prepared in this manner were used in an integrated method in which proteomic samples were sequentially reduced, alkylated, and digested, with all sample and reagent handling controlled by DMF droplet operation. Mass spectrometry analysis of the products revealed that digestion using the trypsin gel discs resulted in higher sequence coverage in model analytes relative to conventional homogenous processing. Proof-of-principle was demonstrated for a parallel digestion system in which a single sample was simultaneously digested on multiple gel discs bearing different enzymes. We propose that these methods represent a useful new tool for the growing trend toward miniaturization and automation in proteomic sample processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".