MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143006403 · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2012.05.010

ABC 1 (1st International consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer): A positive step

2012· editorial· en· W2143006403 on OpenAlexaff
Kathleen I. Pritchard, Berta Sousa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Breast · 2012
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerScopusMetastatic breast cancerCancerDiseaseOncologyInternal medicineFamily medicineMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with advanced breast cancer are in a difficult situation indeed. Such men and women have disease which is currently considered incurable although many treatments can be offered. A broad and effective range of therapies are already available and new drugs being introduced for breast cancer are almost always given first to patients in this setting. However, it is crucial for women with advanced breast cancer that all possible therapies and approaches are made as widely and consistently available as possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.102
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.102
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0060.007
Research integrity0.0150.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe BreastSame topicCancer Treatment and PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207