Sex-based transmural differences in cardiac repolarization and ionic-current properties in canine left ventricles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The female sex is associated with longer electrocardiographic QT intervals and increased proarrhythmic risks of QT-prolonging drugs. This study examined the hypothesis that sex differences in repolarization may be associated with differential transmural ion-current distribution. Whole cell patch-clamp and current-clamp were used to study ionic currents and action potentials (APs) in isolated canine left ventricular cells from epicardium, midmyocardium, and endocardium. No sex differences in AP duration (APD) were found in cells from epicardium versus endocardium. In midmyocardium, APD was significantly longer in female dogs (e.g., at 1 Hz, female vs. male: 288 +/- 21 vs. 237 +/- 8 ms; P < 0.05), resulting in greater transmural APD heterogeneity in females. No sex differences in inward rectifier K+ current (I(K1)) were observed. Transient outward K+ current (I(to)) densities in epicardium and midmyocardium also showed no sex differences. In endocardium, female dogs had significantly smaller I(to) (e.g., at +30 mV, female vs. male: 2.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.3 pA/pF; P < 0.05). Rapid delayed-rectifier K+ current (I(Kr)) density and activation voltage-dependence showed no sex differences. Female dogs had significantly larger slow delayed-rectifier K+ current (I(Ks)) in epicardium and endocardium (e.g., at +40 mV; tail densities, female vs. male; epicardium: 1.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.8 +/- 0.1 pA/pF; P < 0.001; endocardium: 1.2 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.7 +/- 0.1 pA/pF; P < 0.05), but there were no sex differences in midmyocardial I(Ks). Female dogs had larger L-type Ca2+ current (I(Ca,L)) densities in all layers than male dogs (e.g., at -20 mV, female vs. male, epicardium: -4.2 +/- 0.4 vs. -3.2 +/- 0.2 pA/pF; midmyocardium: -4.5 +/- 0.5 vs. -3.3 +/- 0.3 pA/pF; endocarium: -4.5 +/- 0.4 vs. -3.2 +/- 0.3 pA/pF; P < 0.05 for each). We conclude that there are sex-based transmural differences in ionic currents that may underlie sex differences in transmural cardiac repolarization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".