MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143028843 · doi:10.1136/oem.2009.053652

Occupational asthma to caddis flies (Phryganeiae)

2010· letter· en· W2143028843 on OpenAlexaff
David Miedinger, André Cartier, Samuel B. Lehrer, Manon Labrecque

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational and Environmental Medicine · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational exposure and asthma
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
KeywordsAsthmaOccupational asthmaMedicineBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a previous issue of this journal, Kraut and colleagues (Occup Environ Med 1994;51:408–13) reported occupational allergies to caddies flies in the workforce of a hydroelectric power plant. In this survey a significant cross-shift change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of one sensitised individual was interpreted as occupational asthma (OA) to caddis flies. However pre- and post-shift measures of FEV1 are not recommended to either confirm or refute OA.1 2 We herein report the first case of OA to Phryganeiae confirmed objectively by a specific inhalation challenge using an extract of these insects. An engineer started working for an electric power company 7 years ago carrying out repair and maintenance works. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOccupational and Environmental MedicineSame topicOccupational exposure and asthmaFrench-language works237,207