MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143031849

Linear approximations for factored markov decision processes

2005· dissertation· en· W2143031849 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarkov decision processMathematical optimizationComputer scienceRepresentation (politics)Linear programmingDynamic programmingAlgorithmMarkov processMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Markov Decision Process (MDP) is a model employed to describe problems in which a decision must be made at each one of several stages, while receiving feedback from the environment. This type of model has been extensively studied in the operations research community and fundamental algorithms have been developed to solve associated problems. However, these algorithms are quite inefficient for very large problems, leading to a need for alternatives; since MDP problems are provably hard on compressed representations, one becomes content even with algorithms which may perform well at least on specific classes of problems. The class of problems we deal with in this thesis allows succinct representations for the MDP as a dynamic Bayes network, and for its solution as a weighted combination of basis functions. We develop novel algorithms for producing, improving, and calculating the error of approximate solutions for MDPs using a compressed representation. Specifically, we develop an efficient branch-and-bound algorithm for computing the Bellman error of the compact approximate solution regardless of its provenance. We introduce an efficient direct linear programming algorithm which, using incremental constraints generation, achieves run times significantly smaller than existing approximate algorithms without much loss of accuracy. We also show a novel direct linear programming algorithm which, instead of employing constraints generation, transforms the exponentially many constraints into a compact form more amenable for tractable solutions. In spite of its perceived importance, the efficient optimization of the Bellman error towards an approximate MDP solution has eluded current algorithms; to this end we propose a novel branch-and-bound approximate policy iteration algorithm which makes direct use of our branch-and-bound method for computing the Bellman error. We further investigate another procedure for obtaining an approximate solution based on the dual of the direct, approximate linear programming formulation for solving MDPs. To address both the loss of accuracy resulting from the direct, approximate linear program solution and the question of where basis functions come from we also develop a principled system able not only to produce the initial set of basis functions, but also able to augment it with new basis functions automatically generated such that the approximation error decreases according to the user's requirements and time limitations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it