MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143082536 · doi:10.1109/rtcsa.2008.42

Impact of Cache Partitioning on Multi-tasking Real Time Embedded Systems

2008· article· en· W2143082536 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicReal-Time Systems Scheduling
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheCache-oblivious algorithmParallel computingCache coloringCache algorithmsCache pollutionCache invalidationPartition (number theory)Smart CacheCPU cacheDistributed computingReal-time computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cache partitioning techniques have been proposed in the past as a solution for the cache interference problem. Due to qualitative differences with general purpose platforms, real-time embedded systems need to minimize task real-time utilization (function of execution time and period) instead of only minimizing the number of cache misses. In this work, the partitioning problem is presented as an optimization problem whose solution sets the size of each cache partition and assigns tasks to partitions such that system worst-case utilization is minimized thus increasing real-time schedulability. Since the problem is NP-Hard, a genetic algorithm is presented to find a near optimal solution. A case study and experiments show that in a typical real-time embedded system, the proposed algorithm is able to reduce the worst-case utilization by 15% (on average) if compared to the case when the system uses a shared cache or a proportional cache partitioned environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-Time Systems SchedulingFrench-language works237,207