MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143108979 · doi:10.5539/eer.v3n2p7

A Study of Energy Conservation Policies at (Primary) Eco-Schools in Istanbul

2013· article· en· W2143108979 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kutlu Sevinç Kayıhan, Seda Tönük

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy and Environment Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy conservationScope (computer science)Context (archaeology)BusinessRenewable energyNatural resourceEnvironmental educationQuestionnaireEnvironmental planningEnergy consumptionEnvironmental resource managementControl (management)Environmental economicsArchitectural engineeringGeographyPolitical scienceEnvironmental scienceEngineeringComputer sciencePedagogySociologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximately 50% of the energy produced on earth is used by buildings. As for all building types, ensuring the energy conservation in primary school buildings is important in many ways. In addition to environmental and economic benefits, the systematic application of sustainable energy consumption in primary school buildings also makes a positive contribution to the education of future generations. The “Eco-Schools International Programme” aims to introduce environmental management systems into primary schools within the scope of ISO 14001/EMAS. This study examines primary schools in Istanbul that are part of the Eco-Schools International Programme. A questionnaire-based survey was administered on the theme of energy management within primary schools located in Istanbul city, and the findings of a field observation were examined. Questionnaire findings were categorized under three main themes: energy usage and conservation policies at the eco-schools’ buildings’ envelope, energy usage and conservation policies in the indoor environments of eco-schools; and types of energy sources used at eco-schools. According to the main results of the study; solar control elements on the facades, methods aimed at energy conservation from windows, energy-effective woodwork applications and independent control of energy systems (which are used in a small proportion of eco-schools) should be discussed and integrated in all eco-school buildings. It is seen that natural gas is used by 100% of survey respondents and that renewable energy resources are used only at low levels for testing purposes and/or to make small contributions to energy gain. In this context, expanded use of renewable energies at all the eco-schools should be considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy and Environment ResearchSame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207