MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143109034 · doi:10.1109/tia.2009.2031897

Influence of Subsea Cables on Offshore Power Distribution Systems

2009· article· en· W2143109034 on OpenAlex
Xiaodong Liang, W.M. Jackson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsSchlumberger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaSubmarine pipelineHarmonicsHarmonicPower (physics)Marine engineeringEngineeringHarmonic analysisResonance (particle physics)Electric power systemElectrical engineeringComputer scienceElectronic engineeringAcousticsPhysicsVoltageGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subsea cable applications for the offshore power distribution systems create technical challenges in the system design, operation, and maintenance. Harmonic parallel resonance introduced by subsea cables is one of the main concerns. In this paper, parallel resonance is investigated for an offshore distribution system with lengthy subsea cables on four interconnected platforms. Variable frequency drives (VFDs) are the dominant loads on the platforms, which make up to 98% of the total load demands. Subsea cables create a complicated parallel resonance condition in the system. Several resonant frequency bands could interact with harmonic currents injected by VFDs. The ways to attenuate resonance and mitigate harmonics are discussed and compared. An optimized solution for harmonic mitigation is proposed for the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it