MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143153644 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1997.614859

Validation of direct and indirect far-field antenna measurements at Memorial University's electromagnetic facilities

2002· article· en· W2143153644 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bing Yan, S.A. Saoudy, B.P. Sinha

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsCentre For Cold Ocean Resources EngineeringMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnechoic chamberAntenna measurementNear and far fieldAntenna (radio)Radiation patternAcousticsAntenna factorField (mathematics)Electrical engineeringOpticsPhysicsEngineeringComputer scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indoor direct measurement of antenna far-field radiation patterns requires that the antenna be placed far away from the source and data be collected in a controlled environment, i.e., expensive large size anechoic chambers. Data from near-field antenna measurements can also be used to calculate the far-field radiation patterns, which are indirect far-field measurements. A low cost near-field/far-field antenna measurement system and a 4 m/spl times/2.5 m/spl times/2.5 m anechoic chamber have been built at C-CORE, Memorial University of Newfoundland (MUN). The two systems provide significant flexibility in antenna test capabilities. This paper describes this low cost indirect near-field/far-field measurement system. The comparison with data obtained from direct far-field measurement inside the anechoic chamber indicates the validity of both measurement techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207