MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143154444 · doi:10.1242/jcs.154823

Degradation of S-RNase in compatible pollen tubes of<i>Solanum chacoense</i>inferred by immunogold labeling

2014· article· en· W2143154444 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Boivin, David Morse, Mario Cappadocia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cell Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalEspace pour la vie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmunogold labellingBiologyRNase PPollenPollen tubeCytoplasmRNase MRPPollinationBotanyBiochemistryCell biologyGeneticsGeneUltrastructureRNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flowering plant Solanum chacoense uses an S-RNase-based self-incompatibility system in order to reject pollen that shares the same genes at the S-locus (S-haplotype) with the style (an incompatible reaction). Two different models have been advanced to explain how compatible pollen tubes are protected from the cytotoxic effects of the S-RNase, sequestration of the S-RNase in a vacuolar compartment or degradation of the S-RNase in the cytoplasm. Here, we examine the subcellular distribution of an S11-RNase 18 and 24 h post pollination (hpp) in compatible and incompatible crosses by immunogold labeling and transmission electron microscopy. We find that the S-RNase is present in the cytoplasm of both compatible and incompatible crosses by 18 hpp, but that almost all the cytoplasmic S-RNase is degraded by 24 hpp in compatible crosses. These results provide compelling evidence that S-RNases are degraded in compatible but not in incompatible pollen tubes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cell ScienceSame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207