MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143155105 · doi:10.1109/72.950143

Vector quantization of images using modified adaptive resonance algorithm for hierarchical clustering

2001· article· en· W2143155105 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVector quantizationCluster analysisLinde–Buzo–Gray algorithmAdaptive resonance theoryComputer scienceImage compressionAlgorithmData compressionLearning vector quantizationQuantization (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceComputationPattern recognition (psychology)Image processingArtificial neural networkImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A modified adaptive resonance theory (ART2) learning algorithm, which we employ in this paper, belongs to the family of NN algorithms whose main goal is the discovery of input data clusters, without considering their actual size. This feature makes the modified ART2 algorithm very convenient for image compression tasks, particularly when dealing with images with large background areas containing few details. Moreover, due to the ability to produce hierarchical quantization (clustering), the modified ART2 algorithm is proved to significantly reduce the computation time required for coding, and therefore enhance the overall compression process. Examples of the results obtained are presented, suggesting the benefits of using this algorithm for the purpose of VQ, i.e., image compression, over the other NN learning algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it