MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143173652 · doi:10.1190/tle32050522.1

Introduction to this special section: Arctic/ATC

2013· article· en· W2143173652 on OpenAlexaff
William N. Goodway, Michael E. Enachescu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Leading Edge · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticPetroleumThe arcticSpecial sectionPetroleum explorationGeologyFossil fuelPhysical geographyEarth scienceSection (typography)Oil reservesOceanographyGeographyPaleontologyEngineeringBusinessEngineering physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic has been the focus of oil and gas exploration since the 1960s. However, aside from this long history, specifically in areas such as Alaska, Norway, and Russia, Arctic exploration is still a slow and costly venture. Consequently, the region remains one of the world's last petroleum E&P frontiers. Recently, the USGS estimated that 25% of the Earth's remaining petroleum reserves (13% of the world's undiscovered oil and 30% of its gas) are contained in 17 known Arctic basins, some of which have had little or no exploration. These estimates vary because of the paucity of geologic and geophysical data, but the size of the prize remains consistently large.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Leading EdgeSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207