Mechanisms underlying increases in SR Ca<sup>2+</sup>-ATPase activity after exercise in rat skeletal muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prolonged exercise followed by a brief period of reduced activity has been shown to result in an overshoot in maximal sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca(2+)-ATPase activity [maximal velocity (V(max))] in rat locomoter muscles (Ferrington DA, Reijneveld JC, Bär PR, and Bigelow DJ. Biochim Biophys Acta 1279: 203-213, 1996). To investigate the functional significance and underlying mechanisms for the increase in V(max), we analyzed Ca(2+)-ATPase activity and Ca(2+) uptake in SR vesicles from the fast rat gastrocnemius muscles after prolonged running (RUN) and after prolonged running plus 45 min of low-intensity activity (RUN+) or no activity (REC45) and compared them with controls (Con). Although no differences were observed between RUN and Con, both V(max) and Ca(2+) uptake were higher (P < 0.05) by 43 and 63%, respectively, in RUN+ and by 35 and 34%, respectively, in REC45. The increase in V(max) was accompanied by increases (P < 0.05) in the phosphorylated enzyme intermediate measured by [gamma-(32)P]ATP. No differences between groups for each condition were found for the fluorescent probes FITC and (N-cyclohexyl-N(1)-dimethylamino-alpha-naphthyl)carbodiimide, competitive inhibitors of the nucleotide-binding and Ca(2+)-binding sites on the enzyme, respectively. Similarly, no differences for the Ca(2+)-ATPase were observed between groups in nitrotyrosine and phosphoserine residues, a measure of nitrosylation and phosphorylation states, respectively. Western blots indicated no changes in relative isoform content of sarcoendoplasmic reticulum (SERCA)1 and SERCA2a. It is concluded that the increase in V(max) of the Ca(2+)-ATPase observed in recovery is not the result of changes in enzyme nitroslyation or phosphorylation, changes in ATP and Ca(2+)-binding affinity, or changes in protein content of the Ca(2+)-ATPase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".