MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143259707 · doi:10.1109/vecims.2011.6053840

Separation and extraction of energy variants from human motion using temporal minimization

2011· article· en· W2143259707 on OpenAlexaff
S. Ali Etemad, Ali Arya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHuman Pose and Action Recognition
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinificationEnergy minimizationComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Motion (physics)Artificial intelligenceSet (abstract data type)Training setGaitSeparation (statistics)Data setExtraction (chemistry)TrajectoryAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionMathematicsMachine learningStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a new approach based on temporal minimization for separation and extraction of high/low-energy variants embedded in human motion. A data set of over 6500 frames is used for training the proposed algorithm. Spatiotemporal cubic splines are employed for approximating the trajectories associated with walking sequences. The optimal numbers of control points required for synthesizing the neutral movements are calculated. We illustrate that by minimizing an error value with respect to the training data set and reconstructing the trajectories, the low and high-energy variants can be separated from the main gait and hence extracted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.253

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFrench-language works237,207