MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143269105 · doi:10.1139/z10-008

Relative growth, life-history phases, and sexual maturity of American lobster (Homarus americanus)

2010· article· en· W2143269105 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Kim Émond, Bernard Sainte‐Marie, Louise Gendron

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à RimouskiFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHomarusBiologyAmerican lobsterSexual maturityCephalothoraxAllometrySexual dimorphismCarapaceGonopodClawZoologySecondary sex characteristicAnatomyCrustaceanEcologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies of relative growth in crustaceans have focused primarily on body parts representing sexual characters for the purpose of determining size at onset of sexual maturity. We have revisited the relative growth of abdomen and crusher claw in American lobster ( Homarus americanus H. Milne Edwards, 1837) in a general life-history perspective using a broad spectrum of lobster sizes (6–160 mm cephalothorax length (CL)). Growth phases were recognized by inflections in scatterplots of a body-part measurement against CL. The abdomen is characterized by three growth phases in the male and female, whereas the crusher claw has at least three growth phases in the male and at least two in the female. Additionally, we explored relative growth of gonopod and vas deferens for males of 35–150 mm CL. Both organs exhibit a synchronous change from strong to weak positive growth allometry. The growth phases can be associated with major life-history events including the transition from a cryptic to an overt lifestyle and the onset of physiological, functional, and morphometric maturity. The onset of morphometric maturation inferred from relative growth of abdomen and crusher claw precedes functional maturity in females and follows it in males.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207