Standardization of Protocol for Pre-treatment, Surface Sterilization, Regeneration, Elongation and Acclimatization of <I>Chrysanthemum morifolium</i> Ramat
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study we have developed proficient in vitro regeneration protocol from the ray florets of chrysanthemum cv. Thai Chen Queen to isolate the novel mutants. The maximum survival percentage (89.44) of cultures was found when the ray florets were per-treated with mancozeb-45 (0.1%)+carbendazim (0.1%)+8-HQC (200 mg/L) for 3 hours. Culture establishment was found best (91.04%) when the ray florets surface sterilized with HgCl 2 (0.1%) for duration of four minutes. Murashige and Skoog (MS) media supplemented with 4 mg/L BAP and 0.1 mg/L NAA was found to the best for regeneration percentage (93.33), number of microshoots per explants (5.67) and minimum days required for shoot regeneration (30.67). The regenerated plantlets were transferred on the MS media supplemented with GA3 0.50 mg/L was found to the best for shoot elongation after 30 days of elongation. The successful acclimatization of elongated plantlets was achieved by transferring them into glass jar with polypropylene cap filled with peat+soilrite (1:1). The hardening of plantlets was completed after 25 days of acclimatization and then plants were transferred to greenhouse for flowering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it